Automatic language translation
Our website uses an automatic service to translate our content into different languages. These translations should be used as a guide only. See our Accessibility page for further information.
Issued: 7 September 2020
Download PDF (PDF, 132.3 KB)
The Crown, as prosecutor in summary proceedings in the Supreme Court, District Court, or Land and Environment Court, may require questions of law to be referred to the Court of Criminal Appeal for determination after judgment has been delivered in proceedings, but prior to the making of final orders, under s. 5AE of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912.
However, s. 5AE is not a de facto right of appeal: it is a mechanism for the CCA to determine pure questions of law to facilitate the first instance Court to come to a decision.
Section 5AE allows the Crown, "[a]t any time prior to the completion of" summary proceedings in the Supreme Court, District Court or LEC to require the judge to "submit any question of law arising at or in reference to the proceedings to the" CCA.
There is an emerging practice in work health and safety and LEC prosecutions where the Crown:
seeks an adjournment after delivery of judgment that the prosecutor has not proved all elements of the offence beyond reasonable doubt, but before the making of final orders;
to consider, and potentially request the Court to submit to the CCA, a question of law pursuant to s. 5AE.
That practice was followed in Orr; a prosecution in the District Court for an alleged breach of the Work Health and Safety Act 2011. The defendant argued that this created a de facto right of appeal against an acquittal and exposed it to double jeopardy.
The threshold question of law in Orr was whether the District Court had the power under s. 5AE to state a question of law after delivery of reasons for judgment, but before making final orders. The CCA unanimously held that it did. However, this question was the only permissible question of law for the purposes of s. 5AE. The remaining six questions were not.
The key points of the judgment are as follows:
While prosecutors should carefully consider the timing of requiring questions of law to be submitted to the CCA under s. 5AE, it is still permissible to wait until after judgment has been delivered, but prior to the making of final orders.
However, this is only available where the question to be posed is a pure question of law and does not require the CCA to traverse factual findings. An example might be if the prosecutor considers, from the reasons for judgment, that the primary Court would benefit from CCA guidance in interpreting an applicable provision.
Sarah-jane Morris, Director
02 9497 9390
Sarah Ienna, Senior Solicitor
02 9497 9220
Nicholas Geason, Law Graduate
02 9497 9924
To subscribe to Regulatory & Environment Insights please email: email@example.com
16 Nov 2022
We acknowledge Aboriginal people as the First Nations Peoples of NSW and pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future.
Informed by lessons of the past, Department of Communities and Justice is improving how we work with Aboriginal people and communities. We listen and learn from the knowledge, strength and resilience of Stolen Generations Survivors, Aboriginal Elders and Aboriginal communities.
You can access our apology to the Stolen Generations.