Automatic language translation
Our website uses an automatic service to translate our content into different languages. These translations should be used as a guide only. See our Accessibility page for further information.
Issued: 3 July 2020
Download PDF (PDF, 172.2 KB)
Mr Nguyen was charged on indictment with offences against the Criminal Code (NT) when he allegedly threw a bottle of beer at someone after a singing game went awry. He had been interviewed by the police about the offences prior to being charged. The interview, which was recorded, contained admissions together with exculpatory statements in the form of a claim of self-defence ("mixed statements").
At the first trial the prosecutor played the recorded interview and the jury did not reach a verdict. At the second trial the prosecutor made a "tactical decision" not to tender the recorded interview as it would not assist the prosecution case. The defendant applied to stay the second trial.
Following previous NT appellate authority, the Full Court of the NT Supreme Court held that the prosecutor was not obliged to tender the interview as there was no general principle requiring a prosecutor to tender a record of interview simply because it contained admissible material.
The Court unanimously held that the prosecutor was obliged to tender the recorded interview, settling prior divergent judicial authority on this issue. Key points in the joint judgment of 5 judges included:
Prosecutors should assume they are ordinarily obliged to tender mixed statements in recorded interviews. The High Court's decision confirms that this approach, which reflects professional practice in NSW and Victoria, is correct.
Sarah-jane Morris, Director
Regulatory & Environment practice group
02 9497 9390
Naomi Malhotra, Assistant Crown Solicitor
Inquiries & Criminal Law division
02 9474 9184
0416 927 933
To subscribe to Regulatory & Environment Insights please email email@example.com.
16 Nov 2022
We acknowledge Aboriginal people as the First Nations Peoples of NSW and pay our respects to Elders past, present, and future.
Informed by lessons of the past, Department of Communities and Justice is improving how we work with Aboriginal people and communities. We listen and learn from the knowledge, strength and resilience of Stolen Generations Survivors, Aboriginal Elders and Aboriginal communities.
You can access our apology to the Stolen Generations.